We Need Obama! Vote Democratic in 2008!!!

It's Time For Change

2008-10-09T21:23:00.003-04:00

It's Official The Crash of the U.S. Economy has begun

Global Research | October 9th, 2007
Richard C. Cook

It's official. Mark your calendars. The crash of the U.S. economy has begun. It was announced the morning of Wednesday, June 13, 2007, by economic writers Steven Pearlstein and Robert Samuelson in the pages of the Washington Post, one of the foremost house organs of the U.S. monetary elite.

Pearlstein's column was titled, “The Takeover Boom, About to Go Bust” and concerned the extraordinary amount of debt vs. operating profits of companies currently subject to leveraged buyouts.

In language remarkably alarmist for the usually ultra-bland pages of the Post, Pearlstein wrote, “It is impossible to predict when the magic moment will be reached and everyone finally realizes that the prices being paid for these companies, and the debt taken on to support the acquisitions, are unsustainable. When that happens, it won't be pretty. Across the board, stock prices and company valuations will fall. Banks will announce painful write-offs, some hedge funds will close their doors, and private-equity funds will report disappointing returns. Some companies will be forced into bankruptcy or restructuring.”

Further, “Falling stock prices will cause companies to reduce their hiring and capital spending while governments will be forced to raise taxes or reduce services, as revenue from capital gains taxes declines. And the combination of reduced wealth and higher interest rates will finally cause consumers to pull back on their debt-financed consumption. It happened after the junk-bond and savings-and-loan collapses of the late 1980s. It happened after the tech and telecom bust of the late '90s. And it will happen this time.”

Panorama!

2008-04-09T09:11:00.005-04:00

Now I'm On Flickr! Click http://www.flickr.com/photos/donaldp1939/ to See more!...

I took this panorama from the 86th floor of the Empire State Building using a Kodak V1253 Digital Camera. This is a compilation of 3 images.

If You Murdered 4000+ People... Would You Be Considered A Serial Killer?

2008-04-01T22:53:00.002-04:00

Tuesday, April 1 2008 - Stories by Topic

A Third American War in the Making?

March 31, 2008
By Paul Craig Roberts

The US Congress, the US media, the American people, and the United Nations, are looking the other way as Cheney prepares his attack on Iran.

If only America had an independent media and an opposition party. If there were a shred of integrity left in American political life, perhaps a third act of naked aggression--a third war crime under the Nuremberg standard--by the Bush Regime could be prevented.

On March 30, the Russian News & Information Agency, Novosti, cited "a high-ranking security source: "The latest military intelligence data point to heightened US military preparations for both an air and ground operation against Iran."

According to Novosti, Russian Colonel General Leonid Ivashov said "that the Pentagon is planning to deliver a massive air strike on Iran's military infrastructure in the near future."

The chief of Russia's general staff, Yuri Baluyevsky, said last November that Russia was beefing up its military in response to US aggression, but that the Russian military is not "obliged to defend the world from the evil Americans."

It Does Look Like A Controlled Demolition

2007-06-03T07:18:00.000-04:00

Anti-war icon Cindy Sheehan has gone public on her support for the 9/11 truth movement after she told a radio show that the collapse of the twin towers looked like a controlled demolition and that there should be a new investigation into the terrorist attacks.
Sheehan, who made headlines this week after she distanced herself from the Democratic party and the establishment left, joined Alex Jones to share her views on her skepticism towards the official 9/11 story.
Sheehan said her decision to desert the Democrats was sparked last week when the Iraq war funding bill was passed and it was at this point she realized the Democrats had co-opted her simply to help them regain Congress and that they had no interest in ending the war.
Sheehan attacked Hillary Clinton as a "warhawk and a "warmonger" and said there was very little distinction between her and John McCain or Rudy Giuliani.
On 9/11, Sheehan expressed her support for the Jersey Girl's petition, which calls for a new independent investigation of the terrorist attacks, slamming the 9/11 Commission Report as a "total travesty and a smokescreen."
"George Bush and Dick Cheney held hands and testified behind closed doors, not under oath," said Sheehan, adding, "There are many things that just don't add up on that day."
Sheehan questioned why U.S. air defenses were distracted by drills and exercises scheduled for the morning of 9/11 and why standard operating procedure for intercepting errant aircraft was not followed for the first and only time in history.
"When you lose control of an airplane, you intercept it with a military jet and that should only take seconds - from what I understand it's not even an order to do that it's mandatory," said Sheehan.
Speaking on the collapse of the twin towers, Sheehan stated, "It does look to me like a controlled demolition - I'm not an expert - but it does look to me like a controlled demolition - I'm looking at common sense."
"I do see some very high profile people saying it was an inside job," concluded Sheehan.

Why Doesn't Anybody care??

2007-02-24T22:48:00.000-05:00

A bullet pierces his armor and into his chest,
Nothing else could've put that soldier to rest.

To G Dubya a penny was all that you were,
You were some copper dropped on the floor.

You fought for your country and died for a cause,
A cause that was made up of a lie by your boss.

Your son was just six and he did not know you,
Even though it was he you cried to come home to.

At seven it's tough to be on your own,
With no one to catch the ball that you've thrown

Just think of the life that you could have had,
If only you'd only realized that good could be bad

Now this boy will grow up not knowing his dad,
And he will be lied to just as you were once had

He will then join the army just as you did,
Not knowing the truth of the lies that were hid

If we all stay so blind this will go on forever,
Your kin will be used and understand we will never

Until all of you will please just open your eyes,
It's not that hard to see all the lies

You tried and you tried and you tried once again,
but the lies and the lies have pulled you right in

As parents we know our kids are like clones,
But we can not let our children be drones.

Hind Sight North Korea: Is It To Late?

2006-10-10T10:09:00.000-04:00

War rages on in the middle east as Kim Jong Il carries on with his international disobedience. I don't really believe that North Korea tested a nuclear weapon but I do believe there is a reason for them to lie. They push buttons. They continually act against the world and press to prove they are a great military force. I don't believe we can stop a South Korean invasion from happening at this point. Kim Jong is sick and can hardly walk on his own. He has lost support from a good portion of his country and is trying to gain it back militarily. If he can't gain support diplomatically, he will strike fear into the people and force them to regain confidence in their leader. Although North Korea has one of the largest army's in the world, I don't believe they can stand up to the Chinese, Russian, and Japanese if war does break out. The United States on the other hand should refrain from getting involved militarily as Bush keeps wasting away money and lives on the front in Iraq. It is too late to stop the escalation, but North Korea can't win in this world war

Chavez, The Devil, Chomsky, and Us

2006-09-30T09:06:00.000-04:00

by Michael Albert; September 26, 2006
What can leftists learn from Chavez’s UN speech and its aftermath? That the U.S. is the world’s most egregious rogue state. We already knew that and, in fact, so does most everyone else. That Bush and Co. engage in repeated acts of amoral, immoral, and antimoral behavior such as a devil would enact, if there was such a thing as a devil. We already knew that too. That the emperor has no morality, integrity, wisdom, or humanity. We knew that as well. So is there anything in the episode for us? I think there may be. I suspect many leftists would have been happier had Chavez torn into Bush and U.S. institutions by offering more evidence while employing a less religious spin. Perhaps Chavez could have called Bush Mr. War, or Mr. Danger as he has in the past, and piled on evidence to show how U.S. policies in the world, and grotesque domestic imbalances as well, obstruct desirable income distribution, democratic decision making, and mutual interpersonal and intercommunity respect. Chavez might have given evidence how U.S. elites and key institutions impede living and loving and even survival, from Latin America to Asia and back. He might have said that George W. Bush, as the current master purveyor of the most recent violations by the U.S., is, in effect, doing the work of a devil – because he is the spawn of a devilish system. And I suspect many leftists would have probably been happier had Chavez added chapter and verse evidence for his assertions, though I suspect time limits precluded that. But, hey, we can’t always get exactly what we want. And more, the dramatic “smelling of sulfur formulation” that Chavez used may have been exactly what got the sentiment in any form at all in front of millions of readers and viewers. The pundits wanted to use Chavez’s words to discredit him – but, in doing so, they put his claim before hundreds of millions of people. Perhaps without the dramatic formulation, we would have heard nearly nothing.My guess is that Chavez treated the event as he does pretty much all his encounters. He said what he thought. He gave it a passionate, aesthetic, and humorous edge. He calculated that forthrightness would accomplish more than it cost. Content-wise, the speech was typical Chavez, even if most hadn’t heard him saying such things before, due to having not heard him say anything before. Here is Chavez commenting on Bush last March, for example, in a televised Venezuelan address: "You are an ignoramus, you are a burro, Mr. Danger ... or to say it to you in my bad English, you are a donkey, Mr. Danger. You are a donkey, Mr. George W. Bush. You are a coward, a killer, a genocider, an alcoholic, a drunk, a liar, an immoral person, Mr. Danger. You are the worst, Mr. Danger. The worst of this planet."The cost of Chavez’s more recent and far more global forthrightness about Bush is dismissal of Chavez as a crazy lunatic by many people who already felt that way but were restrained in saying so, and by some people swayed by media ridicule of him, who had had no prior opinion. The gain of Chavez’s more recent and far more global forthrightness about Bush is establishing that one can say the truth about the U.S. and less importantly about George Bush, and showing that doing so is in accord not only with truth but also with integrity. It is providing an example for others to be inspired by and act on. What is poison in elite eyes can be vitamins for us, and vice versa.In that respect, what Chavez did reminds me a little of what Abbie Hoffman and some others did in the U.S. to the House UnAmerican Activities Committee, known more familiarly as HUAC, decades ago. Abbie and some others aggressively and dismissively ridiculed HUAC as beneath contempt and unworthy of respect. They laughed at obeying it and via their dramatic stance they moved the prevalent attitude toward HUAC from being primarily fear and trembling to being primarily disdain and dissent. Chavez tried something similar, I think. He voiced what others, even others in the room at the UN, also knew but kept quiet about. He hoped, I assume, that others would take strength and begin to voice their needs and insights too. Bush is a vengeful, greedy, violent, but even more so, obedient thug. Yes, obedient, as in Bush obeys the dictates of the system he has climbed and now administers for the rich and powerful. Bush perfectly exemplifies the adage that in capitalism “garbage rises.” My guess is that Chavez felt that the benefits of standing up to the U.S. and its most elite garbage outweighs the costs of seeming to many people to be an extremist from Mars. So was Chavez right? Did the benefits outweigh the debits?My country, the United States, exists beneath a blanket of disorienting and misleading media madness. It endures a climate of paralyzing and pervasive fear. It encompasses a deeply inculcated hopelessness born of educational and cultural institutions that snuff out communication of dissenting beliefs elevating instead pap and pablum. It suffers a life-draining anti-sociality produced by markets that reward callousness and punish solidarity. Garbage rises in the U.S. because nice guys finish last. And amidst all this, for anyone to tell the full truth, and even more so for anyone to display the appropriate levels of passionate anger that the full truth warrants, makes that person appear to be Martian, appear to be psychotic, appear to be irrelevant, and Chavez wants to reverse that context. Did Chavez fall short of what could be accomplished on that score with one speech? I am not at all sure he did. But if he did, if the price of Chavez’s speech in delegitimating his own credibility in certain circles was greater than the gain in delegitimating greed and violence and in freeing people in very different circles from blind and uncritical obedience and fear, whose fault would that be? Should we blame the one messenger who spoke up? Or should we blame the millions of messengers who know the same substance as Chavez, but hold their tongues? There is a world class bully, Bush. He represents a class of rich and powerful “masters of the universe.” He administers their system of gross inequality. He expands the competitive market hostility they thrive on. He fosters the mental passivity they rely on. He abets the lifelong coercion they utilize. He epitomizes the ubiquitous crassness and commercialism they profit off. He lies to shield their true purposes. He throws bombs far and wide to defend and enlarge their empire. Of course irritating the bully and the system he shills for can unleash nasty behavior. Of course, for a time, in the ensuing onslaught, verbally assaulting the bully can diminish the dissident’s credibility, at least in some circles. It might even boost the bully a bit, in some quarters.Likewise, when there is a climate of subservient obedience to a bully, as we now endure in the U.S., when the bully’s climate people feel that to tell the truth about him and his system is uncivil, and when the bully’s climate overwhelmingly castigates honesty and ridicules passion, then of course being passionately honest will be castigated and ridiculed and at least in part make the truth teller look deviant. So, if that’s the risk, what is the solution? Should we forego truth telling? Or should we tell more truth? Should we coddle our likely enemies. Or should we organize and empower our likely friends?Chavez needs allies, but not ones who say, hey, Chavez is an okay guy, even if a little over the top. Chavez needs allies who stand up to imperialism and injustice in all its forms be counted like him, even right up over the top, but allies who also bring to Chavez criticisms and ideas that run contrary to his own thinking and doing. Chavez embracing Admadinenjad was bad news. His suggestions, in other contexts, that the Venezuelan constitution be amended to allow him to rule longer are bad news. Truth to him, too. But at that UN Chavez wasn’t talking mainly to the people sitting in front of him in the UN with his speech. He was talking to people throughout the U.S. and throughout the world, saying, in essence, it is okay to rebel. And it is okay. And we ought to do it.So that was one lesson. When you revile elites your effectiveness depends less on your particular words than on how many other people are willing to do as much or more than you. Chavez thinks in terms of winning massive change. Most people on the left think in terms of holding off calamities. The contrast is stark and at the heart of the recent incidents. We can learn from his attitude, I think. Chavez waved around Chomsky’s book, Hegemony or Survival. I think there are lessons in that, too, even for us, even though we already know Chomsky’s work. First off, a person, even one that has great social advantages, can humbly aid others. You can get up and say to others, hey, this book, video, set of ideas, or organization is worthy of your time. You can use whatever avenues exist for you, whether it be access to your family or friends, or to your schoolmates or workmates, or to your local media, or even to larger mass media, or even to the whole world, to reach out with advice and pointers that you think are worthy. And you should do that. We all should do that. But we generally don’t. I suspect we are embarrassed to do it. Chavez probably wouldn’t even comprehend that. Just as he had reviled Bush before, he had celebrated Chomsky before too, over and over, with little effect. This guy Chavez tries and tries again. He loses, he loses, he loses, he wins. I would guess that Chavez didn’t think to himself, they will revile me in their columns and commentaries, so I better not rip into Bush and celebrate Chomsky. The ensuing ridicule might reduce my stature, I better avoid it. To rip Bush and celebrate Chomsky will look strange, I better avoid it. If I do that I will be giving time to elevating someone else, and not myself, and I better avoid it. I will be displaying anger and passion, and that will brand me as uncivil and improper, it will label me as undignified and even juvenile, and I better avoid it. How many of us think like that, how often, is a question worth considering.Instead, I suspect Chavez thought, Chomsky’s work deserves and needs to be more widely addressed. It affected me. It needs to affect others. I will try to push it into people’s awareness using all the means at my disposal to do so, which, indeed, he has been doing, though with much less success, for some time now. Of course, we can’t all push an author, a book, an organization, or an idea, and have it jump into international, domestic, or local prominence, whether on our first, fifth, or tenth try. We are not all heads of a dynamic country. We don’t all have a giant stage, or often even a large stage, or even any stage at all, from which to sing our songs. But we can still do our part, wherever we may be. And the fact is, we who know so much often don’t do our part. We often don’t point out sources of ideas and discuss them with our workmates, schoolmates, and families at every opportunity. If we have audiences for our work, again we don’t use our writing, talks, and other products to promote valuable work by others beyond ourselves. Why is that? Sometimes we are afraid of reprisals. Sometimes we are afraid of looking silly. Sometimes we just don’t want to do it because it isn’t our thing. Cheerleading and recommending, that’s not my thing. I doubt it will work. I won’t bother trying. Then our foretelling of failure is fulfilled. Well, we need to get over all that.Again, I think the difference between Chavez and most others even on the left is that Chavez is seeking to win, and we are instead seeking, as often as not, to avoid alienating pundits or to even appeal to them. We are seeking to avoid annoying anyone we like, or anyone we might like, or who might like us. We are seeking to avoid looking odd to anyone, or to avoid making a mistake, or to avoid seeming shrill and angry, or self serving, or passionate. And we need to transcend all that. I think what made Chavez seem so peculiar to so many people is that what he did was, in fact, incredibly peculiar. To stand up to the classist, racist, sexist, authoritarian leader of the U.S. and to mince no words reviling his immorality, was indeed incredibly peculiar. So let’s all stand up to power and privilege and take the stigma out of doing so. It is part of removing the smell of sulfur from the air.And, at the opposite pole, Chavez celebrated and openly and aggressively aided an anti classist, anti racist, anti sexist, and anti authoritarian set of ideas and their author. And that too was peculiar. And we all ought to be doing that too, for lots of able authors and worthy ideas. Indeed, we should do it so much that solidaritous movement building behavior comes to be typical, rather than seeming Martian. We should do it so much and so openly that we move from telling the truth to feeling about the truth the way a caring and sentient soul ought to feel about it, and finally to acting on the truth and on our passionate feelings in accord with wide human interests and in pursuit of compelling and worthy aims. To hell with the dictates of markets and pundits alike.

Ahmadinajad To Speak At UN In NYC?

2006-09-19T10:31:00.000-04:00

"We will find them and bring them to justice", George Bush says for the millionth time. Those countries who harbor terrorists are on our list. If this was true, would we let this guy speak today or just incarcerate him for his past activities with hezbollah and hamas? These are terrorist groups right? Isn't Iran next on our list of places to invade? I guess it will be neat to see how today plays out. I have seen over the past couple of weeks an increasing amount of international support for Iran and their nuclear ambitions. It seems as this admistration carries on about its ways there is less and less support worldwide for the United States. It makes perfect sense. Why should we police the world and tell other nations what they can and cannot have when in reality they need it to defend themselves against us? Ultimately Iran having nuclear weapons in the region puts our soldiers in jeopardy when we invade Iran and Syria. That invasion is almost a guarantee. The North Korea issue went by the wayside because of our interest in the middle east. Wouldn't it be something if North Korea invaded South Korea before we had the chance to invade Iran and Syria. George Bush wouldn't know what to do at that point. Face it, this world is at its boiling point due to our position as a police state. Shit is gonna hit the fan soon. The question is with Tony Blair stepping down from his position in the UK, will we have any allies when it does? At the rate these countries seem to be changing allegiance now, I really don't think so.

Alex Jones: TerrorStorm - A Must See.

2006-09-13T15:45:00.000-04:00

What a brilliant documentary. It is amazing now that I have opened my mind that these so called extremist views have really become not so extreme at all. It seems funny that the extremist view is actually the view put out by the governments themselves. Whether it be here in the US or over in the UK. I cant believe the amount of people who seem to want to stay blindfolded to the truth. It's almost as if they are afraid to do any research for themselves. I personally was not persuaded by anyone to believe what I believe. I did the research myself and formed my own opinions. I emplore all of you to open your eyes to other possibilities in things such as this, or religion, or anything for that matter. Would you send your son or daughter off to a public school you knew nothing about? Or to a babysitter whom you knew nothing about? I would hope you would do some investigating yourself before doing so, I know I would. So then why are so many people completely against the alternative theory of government sponsered terrorism when it has happened so many times in the past all over the world. These are declassified facts! Once top-secret and now 30 years later they become declassified and by then nobody researches those incidents. 30 years from now the information on 9/11 and 7/7 will hopefully be declassified and released to the public as has happened so many times in the past. But by then will you people still be in the dark? Will you do the research now? What has happened in the past really has controlled the present and what happens now will also control the future. Everyone needs to open their eyes to alternatives to everything they are told. Stop living someone elses life and live your own. Please at least watch the documentary "Alex Jones: Terrorstorm". The other must see documentary is "Loose Change: 2nd Edition". You don't have to believe these ideas but you should at least expose yourself to it. The evidence is there and I believe everyone who watches these will change their view if it hasn't changed already.

Our Fearless Leader

2006-09-02T07:36:00.000-04:00

Our Fearless Leader

Here is a short 1 min comedy I compiled. Hopefully it will make a few people laugh. I guess we can't always be depressed about where we are heading. I really got a kick out of some of these pictures. Have a great labor day weekend!

The U.S. Government Planned & Executed 9/11

2006-08-31T06:42:00.000-04:00

Evidence that the U.S. Government Planned & Executed 9/11

Here is a video worth watching regarding the 9/11 cover up.

Would Your Government Fail You?

2006-08-29T08:59:00.000-04:00

Last night on NBC I watched Brian Williams report on hurricane Katrina and the aftermath. It literally made me sick to my stomach to see first hand the slow response of our government from local officials up to the highest branches of the Bush Administration. As people became desperate for food and water and were fighting to survive, government helicopters were flying overhead doing what? They sure as hell weren't picking people up let alone dropping food and water which would have saved many lives. No, people were just left to die in the heat and humidity while we were spending millions of dollars in Iraq rebuilding a nation that we destroyed. Children walked the streets without their parents, passing up dead bodies as they went along. They drank the water because they didn't have a choice. They deficated where they stood or sat. Babies died of dehydration. Elderly people were left to die without their medications. People looted the stores to have items they could trade for food and water. I hate to say this but the dead were murdered by our governments lack of a timely response. Instead of saving the people first which should have been done, they began using the shinook helicopters to repair the levys. In America the people should have come first. We are not a third world country here. That week we were! Our government failed the good people of New Orleans. One question I would like to know the answer to, would the response have been the same elsewhere in the country? I think it would. I don't think it was race that played a role in the slow response. In my previous post about global domination and new world order I explained how mass elimination of people in the world was taking place at the benefit of others. I believe the slow response was due to the B.A.'s wanting the world population to go down. In a situation like this which they didn't cause, the slow response would help their cause. Unlike 9/11, they didn't directly cause the event which took place, they only helped it to escalate. Do you feel safe in America? I used to but I'm beginning to worry about the future of my family.

9/11 When The Man Comes Around

2006-08-25T11:26:00.000-04:00

9 11 When The Man Comes Around

My compilation set to some Johnny Cash!

B.A. LIE: Al-Qaeda Crossing Into U.S. Over Mexican Border

2006-08-24T07:05:00.000-04:00

The Latest from the Bush Administration (B.A.) is that Al-Qaeda has been blending in with Mexicans and learning spanish then crossing into the United States over The U.S.-Mexican border. The source reporting the news was the Fox News Channel. You'll never guess where these Al-Qaeda members are reportedly from.... Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Egypt! Once again the B.A. is trying to throw fear into the American minds and push for more reasons to spread his "War On Terror" into Iran and Syria. It seems that almost every time you hear a B.A. official talk whether it is related or not, Iran and Syria come up. Imagine that... Subliminal messages maybe... My guess is that by sometime in October the Iran invasion will begin. Bush will never remove our troops from the region no matter what the public opinion on Iraq is. His father made that mistake and it took the murder of thousands of Americans to get back into the region. Please pay close attention to all that is happening and make the right decision in 2008. I would not consider myself a Democrat, Republican, Liberal, or other, but I will research every candidate to make sure we don't throw another Neo-Con ino office. Not that with all the voting scandals we really have a choice, but it's worth a shot!

Conspiracy Theory Revisited From 9/11

2006-08-19T07:26:00.000-04:00

Conspiracy Theory

This is a 7 1/2 minute video that a lot of people have not seen. It is worth watching for anyone. Take a few minutes and watch and let me know what you think. I actually have this DVD at home, but I got this portion from youtube.com because it's so easy to blog videos from there. The entire DVD is approximately three hours and raises so many flags about the events that transpired on 9/11. I would be happy to burn and mail anyone a copy of this. Contact me via email if interested. If all you do is check out this segment, it should be well worth your while.

The Economy Is Strong? Is It Really?

2006-08-18T15:05:00.000-04:00

I have a problem with the President and his up and up talks about how great the economy is. Is it even true? I mean half the stuff i've heard from this administration is followed by more skeptics than people who actually believe it. I work in Michigan where more jobs seem to be lost than gained. Yes, most of it seems to be tied to the auto industry, but can that be the reason? My store is down 40% from last year which then was down 15% from the year before. A close family member of mine was just let go from his job after almost 30 years of service. To me it seems a struggling economy when every other house is for sale and offers are accepted at 90% of the asking price nine out of ten times. I would like to here more from other parts of the country and people who can tell me how it really is out there. I'm tired of reading it in the paper and hearing it in the news. Today I heard our brave leader talk about the great economy.... but could that be another statement far from the truth? Please feel free to let me know how your doing so I can here it from someone other than GW. We here about the low 4.8% unemployment rate, which means of 500 million working class people, 24 million are unemployed. Are we creating enough jobs for our growing population? How is this census taken? Is every area in the country included when they take it?
Remember that 10.5 million of the working class are illegal immigrants and the unemployment rate for them is 0% or they wouldn't be here.

"Global Domination" & "New World Order" Fact or Fiction?

2006-08-17T10:41:00.000-04:00

For those of you who believe what the US government is doing is helping the world, Think Again. The highest powers in the world are aware that the world has become over populated, thus creating major problems with supplies not meeting demands in well more areas than just oil.
It came to realization in 1989 when George Bush Sr. was in office. The idea of the Neo-Cons would be to begin to rid the world of those groups of people who were deemed unnecessary thus creating an idea of "New World Order" and "Global Domination". George Bush Sr. began in the Middle East with the Gulf War using many false accusations to give the world reason for US presence their. Unfortunatly for the administration, they lacked the backing of the country to stay in the region to continue the exodus from group to group. The needed more and then ran out of time. Bill Clinton took office and the world was then safe again from the Neo-Cons plans. George W Bush came to office in 2000 with the old administraion Neo-Cons to be re-instated. Future knowledge of an attack on US soil in late 2001 was what they needed to gain the backing they needed to return to the region. Without the help of the government these attacks could never have taken place to the extent to which they did. Would it be enough to begin a "War on Terror" and convince the world we were right? 1 plane, 2 planes, 3 planes, 4? It wasn't until a "plane" (still no video evidence, frames released do not show it) hit the Pentagon that the world could begin back the justification of this so called war. Without prior knowledge that plan could never have happened, but with the help of the Bush Administration this would be the beginning to a never ending war. Five years later, countless thousands dead, the war rages on. The administration let Israel pound away at Lebanon killing women and children, and Hezbollah may have emerged stronger, but hundreds died as well. Wars with Iran, Syria, and Korea are soon to come, "Global Domination" has begun.

The people of the world need to know that the "War on Terror" is actually a war on the weak and poor. It is an effort to single out and eliminate those that we do not need who only seem to absorb the supplies of which the elite will need in the future. It has become more and more apparent even here in our great country as the poor only get poorer and the rich keep getting richer. When more and more jobs are eliminated and the poor cant afford to soak up the supply, millions of those we do not need slowly become non-existent. Only then, as the Neo-Cons want it, will supply be equal to or greater than the demand and only the elite will stand. These are the ideas of the nazi-ish Neo-Cons in an effort to reach their "New World Order" and "Global Domination".

So the question now is... What are you going to do about it?

Plane or No Plane?

2006-08-01T11:14:00.000-04:00

We all know that there was no plane that hit the pentagon. We all know that two planes did hit the World Trade Center. What we don't know is when the liar administration will be forced to tell the truth that they in fact were well aware of the attacks on September 11th, 2001, long before they happened. They actually helped make it possible and in essence killed thousand of Americans and brought fear into all communities. It is so frighteningly obvious that I created this blog for everyone to share their own opinions and force the truth out. Please check back and post comments often. You would be amazed at what we know and how stunningly obvious it actually is.

Facts are facts. What you were shown of the pentagon was a collapsed section of the building. I have a DVD that shows the building after it was supposedly struck by a BOEING 757 (Large Airplane) and there is approximately a 6 foot hole. Firefighters were working hard to spray fire retardent foam on the building while standing in the lawn just ouside the pentagon which might I remind you had not yet collapsed. In fact they stood there on unscarred earth, with no debris anywhere to be seen spraying the foam on a building in which a BOEING 757 (large Airplane) magically disappeared through a 6 foot hole in the wall. A while later that wing which was unoccupied by the thousands of employees at the pentagon (due to the fact that it was under renovation and was completely empty of people) collapsed. Thank God the plane flew 360 degrees in a circle from where it came from to strike the pentagon in that location where no government employees could've been injured....

I think too many people are afraid to voice their opinions because they are afraid of our own government. How can we feel free in "Free America" when we are afraid or can't even trust our own government? I really feel that if we join all of our efforts now when it is so obvious what is going on, we maybe able to do something about it now and protect ourselves and children in the future. We must work together to expose these ideas so far worse events will not happen later. Please don't leave here without posting your thoughts or feelings......